Sponsor: Pfizer (industry)
Phase: 1
Start date: Oct. 3, 2025
Planned enrollment: 294
Sasanlimab (PF-06801591; RN-888; WHO 11161) is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death-1 (PD‑1). It is being developed as a subcutaneous (SC) checkpoint inhibitor dosed most commonly at 300 mg every 4 weeks. Preclinical work showed selective, high-affinity PD‑1 binding, blockade of PD‑L1/PD‑L2, and T‑cell activation without detectable Fc‑mediated effector function. Clinical development includes a pivotal phase 3 trial in BCG‑naïve, high‑risk non–muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and early‑phase studies across solid tumors. (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Non–muscle invasive bladder cancer (BCG‑naïve, high‑risk; Phase 3 CREST, NCT04165317)
- Randomized 1:1:1: sasanlimab+BCG induction+maintenance (Arm A; n=352) vs sasanlimab+BCG induction only (Arm B; n=352) vs BCG induction+maintenance (Arm C; n=351). Primary endpoint met: event‑free survival (EFS) improved for Arm A vs Arm C (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49–0.94; one‑sided p=0.0095). Estimated 36‑month EFS: 82.1% (Arm A) vs 74.8% (Arm C). Benefit was consistent in CIS and T1 subgroups. (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
- Key secondary comparison (Arm B vs Arm C) was negative (HR 1.16; p=0.312), underscoring the role of BCG maintenance in the combination. In patients with CIS at randomization, complete response (CR) at any time was 89.8% with sasanlimab+BCG induction+maintenance vs 85.2% with BCG alone; 36‑month CR maintenance among responders was 91.7% vs 67.7%, respectively. Median OS not different at interim analysis (~41‑month follow‑up); study ongoing. (pfizer.com)
Advanced solid tumors (Phase Ib/II; SC 300 mg Q4W) - Dose‑expansion cohorts showed confirmed objective response rates (ORR): 16.4% in NSCLC (n=68) and 18.4% in urothelial carcinoma (n=38). Median PFS was 3.7 months (NSCLC) and 2.9 months (urothelial); median OS 14.7 and 10.9 months, respectively. Responses and survival tended to be higher with elevated PD‑L1 and high TMB. (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Alternative SC dosing (Phase Ib/II) - A randomized pharmacokinetic study in advanced NSCLC/other malignancies evaluated 300 mg Q4W vs 600 mg Q6W SC dosing; it characterized exposure targets and supported SC schedules for further study. (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Last updated: Oct 2025
PF-02921367 is Pfizer’s internal code for dodecyl maltoside (DDM), a nonionic alkylsaccharide surfactant widely used as a mucosal permeability enhancer and formulation excipient. It is being explored intravesically in bladder cancer to transiently increase urothelial permeability and improve delivery of intravesical biologics/oncolytic viruses; it has also been used clinically as an intranasal absorption enhancer in approved and investigational formulations. DDM itself is not an antitumor agent; it functions as a delivery enhancer. (smartpatients.com)
Bladder cancer (intravesical, delivery enhancer):
• Listed as a study treatment alongside the investigational intravesical agent PF‑08052667 (with or without BCG and/or sasanlimab) in a Phase 1 trial for high‑risk non–muscle‑invasive bladder cancer (NCT07206225; record last updated October 23, 2025). (smartpatients.com)
• Used with the oncolytic adenovirus cretostimogene grenadenorepvec in an expanded access protocol for BCG‑unresponsive NMIBC (NCT06443944). (ichgcp.net)
Intranasal delivery (absorption enhancer/excipient):
DDM has been employed clinically to enhance systemic absorption of intranasal drugs (e.g., naltrexone) and is included in FDA‑approved intranasal products (e.g., sumatriptan [Tosymra], diazepam [Valtoco]) as an absorption enhancer excipient. (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
DDM is not intended to provide direct therapeutic efficacy; rather, it enhances delivery of co‑administered agents.
Bladder cancer: There are no published human efficacy outcomes attributable to DDM alone in bladder cancer. Preclinical studies showed that 0.1% DDM pretreatment or co‑formulation produced >90% urothelial transduction with adenoviral vectors in rodents, supporting its role to potentiate intravesical gene/oncolytic therapies. (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Intranasal pharmacokinetics (as an example of delivery enhancement in humans): In a volunteer study, adding 0.25% DDM to intranasal naltrexone (~4 mg) increased Cmax ~3‑fold and shortened Tmax from 0.5 h to 0.17 h versus the same dose without DDM. (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Note: No standalone human therapeutic efficacy trials of PF‑02921367 (dodecyl maltoside) were found; current clinical use is as a permeation enhancer to support delivery of other active agents. (smartpatients.com)
Last updated: Nov 2025
PF-08052667 (also listed as SGN-B6N in some pipelines) is an investigational intravesical therapy being studied for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). A Phase 1, open‑label, multicenter trial (NCT07206225) began on October 20, 2025, to evaluate PF‑08052667 as monotherapy and in combination with bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) and/or the anti‑PD‑1 antibody sasanlimab. Administration is by intravesical instillation. As of November 2025, no human efficacy or safety outcomes have been reported publicly. [Trial overview, design, and administration details are available from study listings.] (cancer.gov)
The sponsor has not publicly specified the molecular target or detailed mechanism of PF‑08052667 as of November 2025. It is distinct from Seagen/Pfizer’s intravenous integrin β6–directed ADC sigvotatug vedotin (SGN‑B6A; PF‑08046047), which targets ITGB6 and delivers the MMAE payload via a protease‑cleavable linker. That related ADC’s preclinical rationale and Phase 1 program are documented separately and should not be conflated with PF‑08052667. (pfizeroncologydevelopment.com)
Notes: - The PF‑08052667 program is in early clinical testing; details such as molecular target, drug class, and pharmacology have not been disclosed on public trial pages as of the dates cited above. - The sigvotatug vedotin (SGN‑B6A) materials are provided only to contextualize a separate, integrin β6–directed ADC program from the same corporate portfolio.
Last updated: Nov 2025
Goal: Evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of intravesical PF-08052667 as monotherapy and combined with BCG and/or subcutaneous sasanlimab in high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), and identify dose(s)/schedule for expansion with efficacy endpoints.
Patients: Adults (≥18 years) with high-risk NMIBC, specifically CIS with or without concurrent Ta/T1; some cohorts may allow high-grade Ta/T1 without CIS. Includes BCG-unresponsive and BCG-exposed disease after adequate induction (≥5/6 doses), and patients who refuse, are ineligible for, or are not appropriate for cystectomy. ECOG 0–1, with recent tumor tissue available. Excludes prior bladder radiation, concurrent NMIBC anticancer therapy, significant renal/hepatic impairment, hematologic abnormalities, and active uncontrolled infections.
Design: Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, 3-part study: Part 1 monotherapy dose escalation; Part 2 combination dose escalation with BCG and/or fixed-dose sasanlimab; Part 3 dose optimization and expansion in monotherapy and combinations. Allocation is not applicable; treatment continues until discontinuation criteria or for up to about 2 years, with long-term follow-up thereafter.
Treatments: PF-08052667 given intravesically on Days 1, 8, and 15 of 21-day cycles in dose escalation and then at selected doses in expansion; some arms include BCG and/or subcutaneous sasanlimab. PF-08052667 is an investigational intravesical therapy for NMIBC; the sponsor has not publicly disclosed its molecular target or drug class. As of late 2025 there are no reported human efficacy or safety results; the present study is designed to define safety, DLTs, PK, and signals of antitumor activity. The formulation may include PF-02921367 (dodecyl maltoside), a permeation enhancer excipient intended to increase urothelial drug delivery and not itself an antitumor agent. Sasanlimab is an anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibody administered subcutaneously and has shown acceptable safety and antitumor activity across tumor types in early-phase studies; it is being developed in NMIBC, including with BCG. BCG is standard intravesical immunotherapy for high-risk NMIBC.
Outcomes: Primary endpoints: Part 1 and 2 safety—DLTs during the first 21 days; AEs and laboratory abnormalities through approximately 2 years after first dose. Part 3 efficacy—recurrence-free survival and event-free survival up to about 2 years. Secondary endpoints include PF-08052667 PK (Cmax, Tmax, Ctrough, AUClast, half-life), immunogenicity (anti-drug antibodies), complete response rate and duration of response in Parts 1–2, overall survival in Part 3, cystectomy-free survival and cystectomy rate across parts, and additional safety metrics in Part 3.
Burden on patient: High. Participants undergo frequent intravesical instillations on Days 1, 8, and 15 of 21-day cycles, cystoscopic and cytologic assessments typical for NMIBC trials, and intensive early safety monitoring. Dose-escalation parts include pharmacokinetic sampling and immunogenicity testing, increasing the number of blood draws and clinic time. Combination cohorts add BCG instillations and scheduled subcutaneous sasanlimab injections, further increasing visit frequency. Recent tumor tissue is required, and on-treatment biopsies may be requested, adding procedural burden. Travel and time commitments may extend for up to 2 years, with continued follow-up after treatment discontinuation.
Last updated: Nov 2025
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
1. 18 years of age or older (or the minimum age of consent per local regulations)
2. Histological diagnosis of high-risk, non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder defined according to the WHO grading system as carcinoma in situ (CIS), with or without concurrent T1/Ta papillary disease. Note: High-grade T1/Ta papillary disease, in the absence of CIS, may be eligible for certain cohorts in Part 2 and 3
3. BCG unresponsive and BCG-exposed cohorts should have persistent or recurrent disease after receiving at least 5 out of 6 doses of the BCG induction therapy.
4. Have refused or are ineligible or not appropriate for radical cystectomy
5. Tissue Requirement: Available tumor tissue within the last 6 months. On-treatment tumor biopsy is optional, unless mandated based on emerging data, or participating in the Biomarker Cohort, or for disease assessment
6. ECOG PS 0 or 1
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
1. Concomitant anti-cancer therapy for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC); and prior radiation therapy to the bladder are not allowed
2. Renal or hepatic impairment; and hematologic abnormalities as defined in the protocol
3. Participants with active, uncontrolled infection as specified in the protocol
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29579, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Nashville, Tennessee, 37209, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Villejuif, Other, 94800, France
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Paris, Other, 75013, France
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Jerusalem, Other, 9112001, Israel
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Petah Tikva, Other, 4941492, Israel
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Haifa, Other, 3109601, Israel
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Ramat Gan, Other, 5265601, Israel
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Seoul, Other, 06351, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Seoul, Other, 03722, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Barcelona, Other, 08025, Spain
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Madrid, Other, 28041, Spain
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Sheffield, Other, S10 2SJ, United Kingdom
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Evanston, Illinois, 60208, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Fairway, Kansas, 66205, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
New York, New York, 10029, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
New York, New York, 10065, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Syracuse, New York, 13210, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Syracuse, New York, 13215, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Syracuse, New York, 13202, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Not yet recruiting