Sponsor: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (industry)
Phase: 2
Start date: May 28, 2025
Planned enrollment: 220
Fianlimab (REGN3767) is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody targeting LAG-3 being developed primarily in combination with the PD‑1 inhibitor cemiplimab for melanoma and other solid tumors. Multiple phase 3 trials are ongoing in advanced and adjuvant melanoma and in first-line non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); no phase 3 efficacy results have been reported as of October 7, 2025. (ascopubs.org)
Advanced melanoma (phase 1, multicohort; fianlimab 1600 mg Q3W + cemiplimab 350 mg Q3W) - PD‑1–naïve advanced disease: ORR 63% in two independent cohorts (n=40 each); combined across three cohorts without prior anti‑PD‑1 for advanced disease (n=98), ORR 61.2% with median PFS 13.3 months (95% CI, 7.5–NE). CR rates were 12–15% across PD‑1–naïve cohorts. (ascopubs.org) - Prior anti‑PD‑1 in the adjuvant setting (relapse after adjuvant therapy; n=13 within a cohort of n=18): ORR 61.5% and median PFS 12 months (95% CI, 1.4–NE). (ascopubs.org) - Prior anti‑PD‑1 for advanced disease (n=15): ORR 13.3% and median PFS 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.3–7.7). (ascopubs.org) - Post hoc/independent review updates: In a combined analysis of PD‑1–naïve cohorts (n=98) with longer follow‑up, ORR 57% by BICR (CR 25%, PR 33%) was reported, with activity observed irrespective of baseline LAG‑3 or PD‑L1 expression. (onclive.com)
Ongoing phase 3 melanoma trials (no results yet) - First‑line unresectable/metastatic melanoma: fianlimab + cemiplimab versus pembrolizumab; primary endpoint PFS; estimated sample size ~1,500+. (ascopubs.org) - Adjuvant high‑risk resected melanoma: fianlimab + cemiplimab versus pembrolizumab (double‑blind, three‑arm design). (ascopubs.org) - Additional phase 3 head‑to‑head versus relatlimab+nivolumab is enrolling. (yalemedicine.org)
NSCLC (ongoing; no results yet) - Two randomized phase 2/3 trials: (1) PD‑L1 ≥50% tumors—fianlimab + cemiplimab versus cemiplimab; (2) all‑comers with chemotherapy—fianlimab + cemiplimab + chemotherapy versus cemiplimab + chemotherapy. (ascopubs.org)
Across the melanoma phase 1 cohorts of fianlimab + cemiplimab: - Grade ≥3 treatment‑emergent AEs occurred in 44% of patients; grade ≥3 treatment‑related AEs in 22%. An increased incidence of adrenal insufficiency was noted (any‑grade 12%, grade 3–4 4%) relative to typical PD‑1 monotherapy experience; otherwise, the safety profile was broadly comparable to PD‑1 inhibitors. Common AEs included fatigue and rash. (ascopubs.org)
Notes: Efficacy figures above derive from early‑phase studies; confirmatory phase 3 outcomes are pending as of October 7, 2025. (ascopubs.org)
Last updated: Oct 2025
Ubamatamab (REGN4018) is an investigational, IgG-like bispecific T‑cell–engaging antibody being developed by Regeneron for MUC16‑expressing solid tumors, particularly recurrent ovarian cancer; phase 1/2 development is ongoing with randomized phase 2 expansion cohorts opened in 2024 and additional cohorts in MUC16+ endometrial cancer. (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
Early, nonrandomized phase 1 dose‑escalation results (conference presentations) in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer:
Exploratory subsets: ORR 20.7% without baseline visceral metastases (n=29) and 30.8% in high MUC16 expression (n=13). (oncologypro.esmo.org)
Combination with cemiplimab (ESMO 2023 dose‑escalation; 22 patients who received ≥1 dose of cemiplimab):
Note: As of October 2025, randomized phase 2 results have not yet been reported publicly; the trial remains ongoing. (fdaaa.trialstracker.net)
Step‑up dosing is used to mitigate CRS risk in both monotherapy and combination regimens, and phase 2 employs Q3W maintenance dosing after the priming phase. (oncologypro.esmo.org)
ClinicalTrials.gov and major cancer center listings can be consulted for site availability and eligibility details for ongoing cohorts (NCT03564340). (dana-farber.org)
Last updated: Oct 2025
Goal: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of the MUC16×CD3 bispecific antibody ubamatamab as monotherapy and in combinations versus other ubamatamab-based regimens in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, and characterize pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of ubamatamab and select combination agents.
Patients: Adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer that is platinum-resistant, with measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, ECOG 0–1, and adequate organ function. Key exclusions include recent major surgery, severe hypersensitivity to antibody therapies or doxorubicin, active second malignancy requiring therapy, untreated/active CNS disease, and uncontrolled infections including HIV, HBV, or HCV.
Design: Randomized, multi-arm phase 2 trial in platinum-resistant disease with approximately 220 participants allocated to ubamatamab-based experimental arms to compare safety and efficacy across combinations. Investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1 endpoints are used with longitudinal safety, PK, and immunogenicity assessments over up to 3 years.
Treatments: Arm A1 and Arm A2: Ubamatamab plus sarilumab; Arm B: Ubamatamab plus bevacizumab plus sarilumab; Arm C: Ubamatamab plus cemiplimab plus fianlimab plus sarilumab; Arm D: Ubamatamab plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus sarilumab. Ubamatamab (REGN4018) is an IV bispecific antibody that binds MUC16 on tumor cells and CD3 on T cells to redirect T-cell cytotoxicity; it is engineered on an IgG4 backbone with reduced Fcγ receptor affinity to limit off-target effects. Early phase 1 data in recurrent ovarian cancer show monotherapy ORR around 14% with median response duration near 12 months, and enhanced activity signals when combined with PD-1 blockade; cytokine release syndrome (generally grade 1–2) and pain are the most common adverse events, mitigated by step-up dosing. Fianlimab is an anti–LAG-3 IgG4 antibody; in melanoma, when combined with cemiplimab, it has shown substantial response rates in PD-1–naive patients with a safety profile similar to PD-1 blockade but with higher adrenal insufficiency rates. Bevacizumab is a VEGF inhibitor with established activity in ovarian cancer; PLD is a standard cytotoxic agent used in platinum-resistant disease; cemiplimab is an anti–PD-1 antibody. Sarilumab is included as an IL-6 receptor blocker to mitigate cytokine release syndrome risk with T-cell–engaging therapy.
Outcomes: Primary: Objective response rate per RECIST 1.1 by investigator. Secondary: CA-125 response by GCIG, complete response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival; safety including incidence of grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome by Lee criteria and TEAEs by CTCAE v5.0 and Lee criteria; pharmacokinetics of ubamatamab and fianlimab; and immunogenicity (incidence and titers of anti-drug antibodies to ubamatamab, fianlimab, and cemiplimab). Assessments occur for up to 3 years.
Burden on patient: Moderate to high. As a multi-arm phase 2 with T-cell–engaging therapy, participants can expect step-up dosing, extended infusion times, and early-cycle monitoring for cytokine release syndrome, often requiring prolonged clinic visits or potential observation during initial doses. Frequent safety labs, RECIST imaging at regular intervals, serial PK draws for ubamatamab (and fianlimab in Arm C), and repeated ADA sampling add blood-draw burden. Combination arms introduce additional visit complexity (e.g., PLD administration, bevacizumab infusions, dual checkpoint blockade), increasing infusion chair time and monitoring needs. Travel frequency will be higher in the first cycles and then align with Q3–4 week dosing and imaging schedules thereafter.
Last updated: Oct 2025
Caution: ClinicalTrials.gov appears to have newer eligibility criteria than the version saved here. Review the current criteria in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
1. Participants with histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced serous or endometrioid ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (clear cell, mucinous, and carcinosarcoma are excluded)
2. Must have progression on prior therapy documented radiographically and must have at least 1 measurable lesion (not previously irradiated) that can be accurately measured by RECIST 1.1
3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
4. Adequate organ and bone marrow function, as described in the protocol
5. Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer, as described in the protocol
Key Exclusion Criteria:
1. Major surgical procedure or significant traumatic injury within 4 weeks prior to first dose of study drug(s)
2. Documented allergic or acute hypersensitivity reaction attributed to antibody treatments or doxorubicin hydrochloride or components of study drug(s)
3. Another malignancy that is progressing or requires active treatment, as described in the protocol
4. Untreated or active primary brain tumor, Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases, or spinal cord compression, as described in the protocol
5. Uncontrolled infections including but not limited to human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection, or diagnosis of immunodeficiency
NOTE: Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
Seoul, 05505, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Seoul, 135-720, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Daegu, 42601, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Seoul, 8308, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Seoul, 06351, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Seoul, 3080, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Seoul, 03722, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Incheon, Seoul, 21565, South Korea
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Tainan, 71004, Taiwan
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Taipei, 10449, Taiwan
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Taipei, 10002, Taiwan
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Taipei, 116, Taiwan
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Taipei, 11211, Taiwan
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Taipei, 114, Taiwan
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Changhua, Changhua City, 500, Taiwan
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Adana, 01123, Turkey (Türkiye)
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Sakarya, 54290, Turkey (Türkiye)
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Altındağ, Ankara, 06240, Turkey (Türkiye)
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Westwood, Kansas, 66205, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Louisville, Kentucky, 40207, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Hilliard, Ohio, 43026, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
No email / No phone
Status: Recruiting